Enjoy! --But Don't Feed Them!

I  ventured out back yesterday morning looking for new tracks of our elusive coywolf (aka eastern coyote*), and found beautiful fresh tracks all over the place.  I planned to follow them later on to see what she'd been up to, but in the meantime, the dogs needed to go out.  I wondered what the dogs would think of fresh coyote tracks, so I brought them to see.  In the process, the three of us surprised Herself, who spotted us as I did her, about 30 yards away.  (The dogs, bless their weak eyesight, never saw her at all.)  She wheeled instantly round and trotted back into the woods at a pace efficient but not especially hurried.  The dogs, meanwhile, were fascinated by the tracks and snuffled them as thoroughly as my patience would permit.

Going out to take pictures shortly afterward, we surprised each other again.  --odd that she would have stayed so close.  Or maybe not...  Tavi, the little girl my wife looks after on most school mornings, wanted to see them, so I brought her out an hour later, only to surprise Herself a second time.  Tavi was delighted, and went to school with a story to tell. 

I conclude that my elusive coywolf isn't elusive at all, but very familiar--and maybe almost too friendly.  Certainly not the "catch" I pictured her as--a wild animal I once thought to spy on with a night-vision camera (actually a baby monitor picked up from a yard sale).  Instead, I expect to be on a first name basis very soon.

Coywolf in "The Beach" neighborhood of Toronto.  Photo credit copywrite 2013 Coy Wolf Inc., take from http://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/episodes/meet-the-coywolf/meet-the-coywolf/8605/

I began looking up info on coywolves after happening upon a PBS Nature program, and finding out that these enormously adaptable animals are at home even in downtown urban areas--populations are under study in New York City and Toronto.  They are beautiful animals, coyote-like in shape, but closer to gray wolves in size.  Despite have no protection under the law, their populations are expanding in forty-nine states.  They appear to mate for life.  They eat enough rodents to help control populations, and are also very fond of eggs of Canada Geese, whose populations are out-of-control in these parts.  They sometimes tackle deer. 

Coywolves coexist quite happily with humans, liking the environment we create while remaining just skittish enough not to be often seen--especially considering their large populations.  A coywolf can have a territory of 6 square miles, but in a city needs only half that.  Although they sometimes eat pets, the danger of that is probably exaggerated; but best we don't leave pets outdoors unattended.  Statistically, they aren't nearly as dangerous to humans as dogs are. 

The biggest danger to us from these animals comes if they lose their fear of us.  History suggests that we can continue to live happily together if we humans follow one simple rule: DON'T FEED THEM.  It is regular feeding that brings them into frequent close contact and causes them to become fearless.  Therefore do not feed them deliberately, and also avoid feeding them even accidentally--such as by feeding pets outdoors. 

I hope to see them out my windows often.  They're beautiful animals.  But I hope never to see one stand his or her ground in my presence; that animal would sooner or later be a danger to the neighborhood pets and possibly people, and someday likely face a police bullet.

*Now established to be part of a widely-distributed population hybrid between the western coyote and the eastern wolf, with an interesting history.

Morning After Light Snow (and a rant)

Squirrel tracks.

How did I know they were squirrel tracks?

The night and earlier morning gently dusted us with a dry inch of snow--enough to show who's been by.  I walked through the back yard and all the way to the back of the tiny wood, but saw signs of only two visitors: a squirrel and probably a rabbit.  No coy wolf--though it's true the snow was only hours old, and an urban eastern coyote would typically roam a three-square-mile area.  I took the regular photos of my Wild Place.  

A BRIEF AND THOUGHTFUL RANT

(or Might As Well Put This Here as Anywhere Else!)

Many Americans despise the metric system of measurements--the Systeme Internacional.  I do not, but neither do I follow it slavishly.  You may have noticed me mix the measurements even within the same post, as I did in "Domestic Science." 

I grew up with the English--or "customary"--units of measure: inches, feet and  miles, pints, quarts and gallons, ounces, pounds and tons, and so forth.  I well remember being taught that America was going metric, so we'd better learn it; this was in third grade in about 1967.  You'll have noticed by now we've been easing into it pretty slowly!   (As far as I am aware, the only time most of us use metric units is to buy soda!)   I am pretty comfortable with millimeters, meters and kilometers, though, as well as grams, kilograms and tonnes, and milliliters and liters.  They are universally used in the sciences which are my background.

Metric units have two great advantages over customary units.  First, they are more fundamentally derived: the meter comes (originally) from French measurements of the distance from the north pole to the equator through Paris.  A cube 1 centimeter on a side contained a volume of 1 milliliter, and this volume of water has a mass of one gram--all neat and tidy!  The second and a very practical advantage came when you had to do any kind of math: all the units related directly to each other, and all by powers of ten.  For example, a distance of 1000 meters was one kilometer, while a meter in turn contained 1000 millimeters.  A liter bottle of water has a mass of one kilogram.  Quick: since a mile is 5280 feet and a foot is 12 inches, figure out how many inches are in a mile!   Doing math in the metric system, by contrast, reduces to merely keeping track of the decimal point!

On the other hand, having physically-derived units doesn't make a system practical, and having units that relate by powers of ten limits, somewhat, their flexibility in size.  for example, I am 6'2" tall.  In the metric system, my height would usually be represented as 188cm --in my opinion, a rather unwieldy number of digits.  Feet and inches are better sized for many everyday purposes than centimeters and meters.  Furthermore, breaking down units fractionally has its own elegant simplicity: if you want a smaller unit, just halve the one you've got by doubling the denominator: 1/2 inch, then 1/4 inch, then 1/8 inch, and so on, limited only by the steadiness of your hands, the acuity of your eyesight, and your technology.  The problem  is it does force one to get down and diry with fractions, which still don't come easily to me.  Here's an example I wrestle with frequently. Put these drill bits in ascending order of size: 5/32, 1/8, 11/64. 

Finally, although the Celsius scale of temperature measurement is elegant in dividing the temperature difference between the melting point and boiling point of water into 100 equal parts, those parts--the Celsius degrees--are almost twice as big as Fahrenheit degrees, and they force you to use negative numbers in winter.

Therefore, I will continue to mix my systems in these posts: metric if much math is involved, English if it's much more convenient in size, and Fahrenheit pretty much always!